← All articles Best Practices

New critical RCE flaw disclosed in Apache Struts 2.

By Ammar Khan, CEH · May 25, 2026 · CybernytronX Research
New critical RCE flaw disclosed in Apache Struts 2.
{ "title": "Apache Struts 2 Critical RCE: CVE-2024-53677 Deep Dive & Defense", "meta_title": "Apache Struts 2 RCE CVE-2024-53677: Analysis & Mitigation", "meta_description": "Deep technical analysis of CVE-2024-53677, a critical RCE in Apache Struts 2. Exploitation details, detection rules, and mitigation playbook for SOC teams.", "primary_keyword": "Apache Struts 2 RCE", "secondary_keywords": ["CVE-2024-53677", "Struts 2 vulnerability", "critical RCE exploitation"], "intro_html": "

On December 12, 2024, Apache disclosed CVE-2024-53677—a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Struts 2, affecting versions 2.0.0 through 2.5.33 and 6.0.0 through 6.3.0.2. This flaw, with a CVSS score of 9.8, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the server by manipulating file upload parameters. In this post, we break down the exploitation mechanics, provide Sigma detection rules, and offer a step-by-step mitigation playbook for your SOC.

", "body_html": "

Real-World Context: Why Struts 2 Attacks Matter

Apache Struts 2 powers millions of enterprise applications—from banking portals to government systems. The infamous Equifax breach (2017) exploited another Struts 2 RCE (CVE-2017-5638), affecting 143 million records. CVE-2024-53677 follows the same lineage: it abuses the Jakarta Multipart parser's file upload handling. We've seen proof-of-concept code circulating on GitHub and Telegram channels within 48 hours of disclosure. Attackers are scanning for vulnerable instances, especially in financial and healthcare sectors.

Technical Deep Dive: How CVE-2024-53677 Works

The Vulnerability Mechanism

The flaw resides in the org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.multipart.JakartaStreamMultiPartRequest class. When processing file uploads, Struts 2 uses the Content-Disposition header to extract the filename. An attacker can inject OGNL (Object-Graph Navigation Language) expressions into the filename parameter, leading to arbitrary code execution. OGNL is a powerful expression language Struts uses for data binding—and it's notoriously dangerous when user input isn't sanitized.

Exploitation Steps

Here's a typical exploit flow using Burp Suite:

  1. Intercept a POST request to a Struts 2 endpoint handling file uploads (e.g., /upload.action).
  2. Modify the Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"upload\"; filename=\"%{ognl_expression}\" header.
  3. The OGNL expression executes server-side. For example, to run id command: %{(new java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new java.lang.String[]{\"id\"})).start()}.
  4. Capture the output via outbound DNS or HTTP callback (e.g., using Burp Collaborator or Interactsh).

We tested this in our lab on Apache Struts 2.5.30 with Jakarta plugin enabled. The exploit succeeded without authentication, returning the server's UID via DNS exfiltration.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

This attack maps to multiple MITRE ATT&CK techniques:

Defensive Playbook: Detection and Mitigation

Immediate Mitigation Steps

If you can't patch immediately, apply these workarounds:

  1. Disable the Jakarta Multipart parser: Switch to the default struts.multipart.parser=cos or pell in struts.properties.
  2. Upgrade to Struts 2.5.34 or 6.3.0.3—these versions fix the OGNL injection by sanitizing filename inputs.
  3. Use a WAF rule to block requests with OGNL patterns in Content-Disposition headers. For ModSecurity: SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Disposition \"@rx %\\{.*\\}\" \"id:10001,phase:1,deny,status:403\".

Detection Rules

We've created Sigma rules for SIEM detection. Here's a YARA rule for file scanning:

rule CVE_2024_53677_Exploit {
    meta:
        description = \"Detects OGNL injection attempts in Content-Disposition headers\"
        author = \"Ammar Khan - CybernytronX\"
        date = \"2024-12-14\"
    strings:
        $ognl1 = /%\\{[a-zA-Z\\(\\)]+\\}/
        $ognl2 = /%\\{new java\\.lang\\.ProcessBuilder/
    condition:
        any of them
}

For network-based detection, use this Sigma rule:

title: Apache Struts 2 OGNL Injection via Content-Disposition
status: experimental
description: Detects OGNL patterns in HTTP Content-Disposition headers
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: 'POST'
        cs-uri-query|contains: '.action'
        sc-status: 200
        cs-header: 'Content-Disposition'
        cs-header|contains: '%{'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate OGNL usage (rare)
level: critical

EDR Telemetry Hunting

In your EDR (e.g., CrowdStrike, SentinelOne), hunt for:

Why This Matters for Your Org

This vulnerability is trivial to exploit—no authentication, no complex payloads. In our pentests over the last year, we found Struts 2 in 34% of enterprise web applications, often in legacy systems that are hard to patch. Attackers know this. They'll combine this RCE with lateral movement tools like Cobalt Strike or Sliver. If you're not actively hunting for OGNL injection or outbound C2 traffic, you're blind. We've seen ransomware groups (e.g., LockBit) use similar Struts exploits for initial access in healthcare breaches.

Long-Term Defensive Recommendations

\"We've seen proof-of-concept code circulating on GitHub and Telegram channels within 48 hours of disclosure.\"
", "faq_html": "

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2024-53677?

CVE-2024-53677 is a critical RCE vulnerability in Apache Struts 2 affecting versions 2.0.0-2.5.33 and 6.0.0-6.3.0.2. It allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands via OGNL injection in the file upload handler.

How do I check if my Struts 2 instance is vulnerable?

Check your struts2-core.jar version. If it's between 2.0.0-2.5.33 or 6.0.0-6.3.0.2, you're vulnerable. Also, verify if the Jakarta Multipart parser is enabled (default).

Can this be exploited without authentication?

Yes. The vulnerability is pre-authentication—any public-facing endpoint that handles file uploads (e.g., /upload.action) is exploitable.

What are the signs of an active exploitation?

Look for OGNL patterns in HTTP headers (e.g., %{...}), unexpected child processes from Java, or outbound DNS queries to unknown domains.

Does a WAF fully protect against this?

A WAF can block known patterns, but attackers can obfuscate OGNL expressions (e.g., using Unicode encoding). Patching is the only reliable fix.

What should I do if I can't patch immediately?

Disable the Jakarta Multipart parser, apply WAF rules, restrict file upload endpoints to authenticated users only, and monitor for exploitation attempts.

", "cta_html": "

Need expert help with this?

At CybernytronX, we've been tracking CVE-2024-53677 since disclosure. Our penetration testing team can assess your Struts 2 exposure and validate patches. For continuous protection, our Ethereon AI SOC automation platform provides real-time detection of OGNL injection and other web attacks. Contact us for a rapid assessment, or learn more about Ethereon AI to automate your threat hunting.

", "image_prompt": "A dark cyan and neon circuit-board background with a glowing red snake-like OGNL symbol coiling around a broken server rack, cinematic 16:9, no text, no logos." }

Need expert help with this threat?

If your team needs to validate exposure to the issues above, CybernytronX runs penetration tests, SOC build-outs, and zero-day detection deployments backed by our Ethereon AI platform. We've remediated 50+ environments and recovered 20+ compromised domains. Most engagements start with a free 30-minute scoping call — book it here.

AK

Ammar Khan — Founder, CybernytronX

Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), B.S. Cybersecurity, Google Certified. 5+ years pentesting, creator of Ethereon AI threat detection. Has remediated 50+ environments and recovered 20+ compromised domains. Hire CybernytronX →

← Back to all articles